Regístrese ahora para una mejor cotización personalizada!
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has argued in an ongoing case that artificial intelligence (AI) lacks the necessary legal capacity to be considered an inventor and that inventions by AI cannot be patented.
The court case was brought forward last year after the USPTO denied applications by Stephen Taller to patent inventions created by the 'Dabus' creativity machine.
The USPTO argument mirrors a decision previously passed by the European Patent Office, which stated that according to the European Patent Convention only human beings or 'natural persons' may be considered inventors.
Etiquetas calientes:
Inteligencia Artificial
Derechos de propiedad intelectual
Regístrepor correo electrónico ahora para acciones semanales de promoción
100% free, Unsubscribe any time!
Add 1: Room 605 6/F FA YUEN Commercial Building, 75-77 FA YUEN Street, Mongkok KL, HongKong Add 2: Room 405, Building E, MeiDu Building, Gong Shu District, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China
Whatsapp/Tel: +8618057156223 Tel: 0086 571 86729517 Tel en Hong Kong: 00852 66181601
Correo electrónico: [email protected]
English
Pусский
Français
Español
Português
