Regístrese ahora para una mejor cotización personalizada!
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that Uber failed to provide users with reasonable notice of the terms and conditions for arbitration clauses, in addition to having failed to obtain a clear manifestation of assent to the terms. Plaintiffs of the case sued Uber alleging that three Uber drivers refused to provide a ride to one of its users because he was blind and was accompanied by a guide dog, which violated the state's antidiscrimination law. In an earlier court ruling, the individual was denied having the case judicially examined because of the arbitration clause. After the Supreme Court decision, the plaintiff will have the right to have his case decided by a judge instead of an arbitrator.
Etiquetas calientes:
Jurisdicción competente
Uber mapa Uber
Resolución alternativa de controversias
Regístrepor correo electrónico ahora para acciones semanales de promoción
100% free, Unsubscribe any time!
Add 1: Room 605 6/F FA YUEN Commercial Building, 75-77 FA YUEN Street, Mongkok KL, HongKong Add 2: Room 405, Building E, MeiDu Building, Gong Shu District, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China
Whatsapp/Tel: +8618057156223 Tel: 0086 571 86729517 Tel en Hong Kong: 00852 66181601
Correo electrónico: [email protected]
English
Pусский
Français
Español
Português
